Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amina Anshba vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Anshba vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Amina Anshba vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Anshba 1 - 1 Mandlik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anshba has won 47.15% of points on their second serve, while Mandlik has won 43.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anshba, in recent form, has won 54.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 53.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.57% and 38.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Anshba has saved 49.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 45.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Anshba has won 35.29% of matches played (W/L 12/ 22), with Mandlik winning 50% (W/L 26/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Anshba has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 200/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Anshba has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 19), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Anshba winning 1 times and Mandlik being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Anshba winning 3 and Mandlik winning 3. The last match between Anshba and Mandlik was at the W25 Daytona Beach, 10-11-2021, First, Clay with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Anshba and Mandlik have played a deciding set 2 times, with Anshba winning 1 times and Mandlik 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Anshba winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anshba has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.15 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 207.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anshba has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Anshba has converted 43.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 50.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
525
Rank
278
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
150
Rank
97
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
57% (245-184)
Career Total W/L
56% (149-115)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$8,220
Career Prize Money
$308,720
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Amina Anshba vs Elizabeth Mandlik For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Anshba VS Mandlik
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Amina Anshba | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:30 | 2:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (111/164) | 51% (92/181) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (61/111) | 63% (58/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (24/53) | 44% (39/89) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (11/26) | 46% (13/28) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (84/181) | 48% (79/164) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Amina Anshba
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
41 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amina Anshba | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (14/20) | 41% (17/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (145/164) | 48% (186/200) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 30% (3/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 23 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:16 | 1:36:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 287.86 | 176.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (749/1012) | 59% (724/1236) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (408/749) | 60% (436/724) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (124/263) | 44% (224/512) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (61/141) | 51% (73/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (491/1064) | 45% (551/1237) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (5/9) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (5/14) | 35% (6/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Amina Anshba Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Amina Anshba
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Jessie Aney
76%
(
80 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
53 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Eden Silva
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Nina Ugrelidze
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Amina Anshba
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Yana Morderger
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Amina Anshba
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
12
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Amina Anshba
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Amina Anshba
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
79%
(
95 of
120)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
56 of
95)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amina Anshba
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
91%
(
40 of
44)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Amanda Anisimova
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Daria Snigur
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Claire Liu
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anshba Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Anshba are available here and Mandlik photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
